Metabolic windowThis reddit is a place to learn, teach, and share information on the myriad ways we all work to improve our health and fitness, and achieve our training goals. Primarily aimed at non-beginners, though anabolic window wiki are welcome. How to Read Scientific Studies. Check out anabolic window wiki rest. Is there a definitive answer to the "anabolic window"? You should eat protein before so that the protein coming in blood is in accordance with the training. The window duration is 24 hours widow up to 72 hours" lol, I did read that in the same sentence somewhere.
Anabolism - Wikipedia
This reddit is a place to learn, teach, and share information on the myriad ways we all work to improve our health and fitness, and achieve our training goals. Primarily aimed at non-beginners, though all are welcome. How to Read Scientific Studies.
Check out the rest. Is there a definitive answer to the "anabolic window"? You should eat protein before so that the protein coming in blood is in accordance with the training. The window duration is 24 hours "or up to 72 hours" lol, I did read that in the same sentence somewhere. You can just eat twice a day and workout each body part only once a week it's better way to train leangains. Can someone here claim to have an answer?
The body doesn't have an effective buffering system for amino acids like it does for fats and carbohydrates. The only "buffer" available is via protein synthesis. Given that you only need so many proteins, past a point more amino acids just increase protein turnover. Your body also can tell how old proteins are via accretion of post-translational modifications particularly acetylation and ubiquination. These modified proteins have the side effect of directly and indirectly modulating gene transcription, so a cell full of old proteins will respond differently to environmental stimuli than a cell with young proteins.
One consequence of this is that cells full of old proteins will have a greater protein synthesis response to things like influx of amino acids. Thus, the longer you go without protein, the more your body will respond to it.
There is evidence that much of the remodeling of muscle protein after exercise is induced by post-translational modification. As a result, a significant portion of the effect of resistance training is to make you more responsive to nutrients, and that responsiveness would only be ablated by protein turnover in response to nutrient intake.
That being said, post-translational modification is certainly not the only driver of muscular adaptation, and it is likely that other mechanisms at play may be both time and amino acid dependent, resulting in an anabolic window effect. We don't know for sure, but we do know that if present such an effect is small enough that chronically underpowered exercise and nutrition studies have been unable to clearly demonstrate it.
If you are a high level competitor looking for an edge, it is probably a good idea to assume the existence of an anabolic window, but the average joe shouldn't stress over it. If everything else is perfect, timing may have an effect. Short of that there are other factors that are more important to worry about. Can you drop me a link or reference to where you got this?
Im not asking to be a dick, but have not heard about how post translational modification can influence the rate of protein synthesis. Where is it believed to have effect? There's a ton out there if you include regulation of protein turnover in atrophy processes and cardiac hypertrophy. There is evidence that activated macrophages actually play a significant role in the overall process. Additionally, signals from the central nervous system regulate protein turnover in the muscle. The human body is a complex system, it's a mistake to try and reduce everything to one pathway.
Acute dietary suppression of MPB likely caused by elevated serum insulin level in response to feeding. Additional amino acids will not be taken up beyond this point. Dietary elevation of MPS has a refractory period, i.
Eating every four hours solves for this. The greater the number of muscle fibers sufficiently stressed in training the greater the degree of MPS possible. Training muscle groups with a high muscle fiber count allows for greater growth and requires additional nutrients. The additional nutrients are required for the 48 hours following training, though it is possible that 24 hours is close enough.
We can conclude that diet must be responsive to training. A volume squats day requires more calories and protein than a volume biceps day. Is there any evidence that protein in the body will be funneled to certain areas preferably? I assume the recovering muscles would still require a high amount of protein. In practice then, would it be better to hit smaller muscle groups before others?
Recovering and adapting muscle groups are definitely greedier for nutrients. When eating at a surplus this is fine, there are no significant implications for training programming. Anabolic windows is a myth, I am too lazy to link to the studies, search it up on examine. There isn't a perfect time for you to eat protein, carbs and fats, it is seen as a whole-picture and many variables come into play weight, height, genetics etc.
Here's what we do know, and what I actually discussed with my professor here the other day I'm a med student:. If you are in a surplus, and you intake of protein varies greatly, the effect hereof is miniscule. Unless your protein intake is very small for a prolonged amount of time, it won't have an effect on LBM. Eating big amounts of sugar and high-GI food can cause high spikes in insulin and sugar levels, this will cause the body to favour storing fat contra building LBM.
These are just some thoughts we played around with, it is based on some studies we found that I currently can't look up, so take it with a grain of salt, but when and what to eat heavily depends on whether you are in a prolonged deficit or in a surplus.
The Information in this post is not a fact, it's based on discussion between me and my professor, do your own research. Here's a meta-analysis on protein timing showing no effect in the majority of circumstances. With that said, high-quality protein dosed at 0.
Low bodyfat is not the direct cause of low testosterone - it is via an indirect mechanism. The mechanism for this action is a reduction in the availability of cholesterol for testosterone biosynthesis.
Cholesterol is synthesized from saturated fatty acids. Not only does low bodyfat result in reduced availability of fatty acids for cholesterol synthesis, low cellular energy states directly downregulate the cholesterol synthesis pathway. Additionally, the high carb, high fiber cutting diet also has the effect of downregulating cholesterol synthesis, increasing cholesterol excretion and reducing conversion of cholesterol to testosterone.
Given that this sort of diet is widely preferred for contest preparation it just goes to show how powerful insulin is as an anti-catabolic hormone compared to testosterone. In a somewhat ironic twist, switching from glucose to ketone metabolism and hormones released as a result of organism-level low energy states actually upregulate the synthesis pathway for testosterone from cholesterol as does caffeine.
Also, throwing my two cents in there: Extremes full keto or extreme low fat have higher costs than benefits with regards to LBM than just finding a comfortable middle ground. Search up the study yourself because I am honestly to lazy to do it.
In fact, you implied your statement was supported by research that was readily available, and you were just "too lazy" to look it up yourself. Alan Aragon and Brad Schoenfeld have researched this topic extensively, they co-published a paper a few years ago on the topic. It exists, but it's not a huge deal, total daily protein intake matters more than during the "window".
Consuming calories with at least some coming from protein within about 1. And also in No there is no definitive answer, but the weight of evidence suggests that there is no anabolic window. The best evidence available at the moment suggests that the anabolic window is a myth. Research hasn't repeatedly demonstrated that taking in certain nutrients within a certain timeframe after exercising results in greater muscle gains than not. Evidence does suggest that it's more important to ensure you have adequate protein intake in your overall diet over days, weeks and months, rather than hour-to-hour , than to 'time your nutrient intake properly'.
Please follow proper Redditquette. A place to discuss fitness, health, nutrition, and training programs beyond the beginner or introductory stages. A place for you to ask questions and learn from others on the above topics. A gathering place for enthusiasts, athletes, researchers, and everyone in between to discuss shared interests. Somewhere where intelligent discourse and thoughtful questions are the norm, not the exception. A place for you to spam your crappy products. A sub that will dispense medical advice.
If you have a condition that is affecting your lifts, you need to talk to a medical professional. AF is not a place where information will be spoon fed. If you want a 'tl;dr' or 'ELI5' you're in the wrong place. This is not a place for memes, rage comics, image macros, or things that provide no value. This is not a place to post threads where the only discussion to be had is congratulating the OP. Welcome to Reddit, the front page of the internet.
Become a Redditor and subscribe to one of thousands of communities. AdvancedFitness submitted 1 year ago by throwabcdaway2. You should eat protein right after workout post workout thing You should eat protein before so that the protein coming in blood is in accordance with the training The peak is 24h houf after workout The window duration is 24 hours "or up to 72 hours" lol, I did read that in the same sentence somewhere.
Want to add to the discussion? To get you started: By eating every 4 hours, MPB is effectively minimised. That makes perfect sense.